Play AppSec WarGames
Want to skill-up in secure coding and AppSec? Try SecDim Wargames to learn how to find, hack and fix security vulnerabilities inspired by real-world incidents.
A security patch that was added to Apache’s httpd to prevent path traversal vulnerability was still vulnerable. This vulnerability was reported in CVE-2021-41773: Apache Path Traversal
while (path[l] != '\0') {
/* RFC-3986 section 2.3:
* For consistency, percent-encoded octets in the ranges of
* ALPHA (%41-%5A and %61-%7A), DIGIT (%30-%39), hyphen (%2D),
* period (%2E), underscore (%5F), or tilde (%7E) should [...]
* be decoded to their corresponding unreserved characters by
* URI normalizers.
*/
if ((flags & AP_NORMALIZE_DECODE_UNRESERVED)
&& path[l] == '%' && apr_isxdigit(path[l + 1])
&& apr_isxdigit(path[l + 2])) {
const char c = x2c(&path[l + 1]);
if (apr_isalnum(c) || (c && strchr("-._~", c))) {
/* Replace last char and fall through as the current
* read position */
l += 2;
path[l] = c;
}
}
So what is wrong with the above patch?
If we do not normalise or enforce charset-safety before security parsing, our security validation can get bypassed. Apache’s patch for the above path traversal bug is prime example of this. They did a right thing to implement a validation, but an encoded version of the path could bypass it.
How it can be attacked? The picture below tells the story
Thanks to @raaqim to point me to this finding
Want to skill-up in secure coding and AppSec? Try SecDim Wargames to learn how to find, hack and fix security vulnerabilities inspired by real-world incidents.
Join our secure coding and AppSec community. A discussion board to share and discuss all aspects of secure programming, AppSec, DevSecOps, fuzzing, cloudsec, AIsec code review, and more.
Read more